My interpretation...A concept...
Socialism is Capitalism without the middle man- money...
You cannot have true Socialism- when money is still involved...
Inexistent poverty before entering Socialism
Upper scale intelligence level required or at least some
earn success for a better life
all citizens given basics to survive
currency replacement possible points w/ bonuses
no corruption allowed
Not for profit
Manageable personnel debt only
Capitalism/ Socialism merged...
Can use cash (middle man)
or
point system (which can be universal)...Digital
1 point= 1$...1 point = 1 Yen...! point = 1 Euro
Money stays and circulates within the economy / the same if decided on point system
basics given / a better life is earned
Not for profit-
base salary + bonus incentives
Success earned by performance not 00's
ways to make affordable...
sustainable farming
solar energy + other possible methods
would require investment
affordable housing is the bigger ?...then location...organization...
not for profit = eliminates customer scams...eliminates one being screwed over...eliminates cheating...keeps currency within the system...
Possibly have worker...paying off initial investment rather than earning an income...employment status comes into question...and if work will sustain...
Point system might be a way for a global currency if bitcoin proven to be reliable...
1 point = 1$
Just like Blood Circulation is important in a Healthy Body...Currency Circulation is important in a Healthy Economy...
Nature answers more questions then we are still led to believe...
We start off in Communist Societies... then as we start to evolve... we transition to a Capitalist World...when we finally take notice of our flaws...intelligence shows us the way to course...as we slowly transform to a Socialistic Way...
Above statement does not necessarily mean a full Socialistic path...a combination of Capitalism with Hints of Socialism might be the answer to Historic Setbacks...
Having many small businesses start up... not only helps the current situation ..but... secures a future of employment...Keeping the money in house and within the economic system is a recipe for a healthy thriving economy...
employees earnings are spent in support of other businesses to stay afloat...and vice versa...money spent on company for said duty...used to pay employees...who turn around and spend it with other companies...keeping them afloat...money company receives...and then spends with another company for said service...keeps money circulating and ultimately returning...and the cycle continues...
In all honesty...just saying...but...money becomes like a middle man...
Perhaps: think about Socialism as an endgame for the successful...this way no person would feel cheated or used...dividing the groups into classes of luxury... based on ones success............there is a flaw in the above statement:... stating- ones success - if measuring success based on 0's rather then performance...but with performance ...comes economic success ...but some performance levels are unfair... compared to others... with equal or greater performance...all... in the interpretation though...
One thing I never understood with tech companies...is...why lump everything into one...why not have two companies... with same ownership ...but... and when purchase a new company...combine the money from both... as if partners for a third...and so on...
I don't see why you couldn't have...multiple companies...same ownership but separate from one another...For example...Instead of Facebook as a monopoly the conversation changes to Zuckerberg owner of several companies...I hope this makes sense...?...
Wouldn't that be the same thing as breaking them up...?
Might want to check with someone more qualified...But I think this is what folks are asking for when they say "Breakup"...?
Next they will say well that is too much wealth for one man...Perhaps...but...it depends on the endgame...but...everyone praises Capitalism...so you can't fault a person for being more business savvy then the average guy...
If you take note...you'll find that breaking up alone won't do a thing...it would be unfair to force him to sell and...besides...he still gets paid if he sells and his money will still likely grow as he will undoubtedly invest...
Data Collection could just be combined if forced to breakup...
Perhaps he goes with option A (to separate) and we set future regulations ...that sounds more sensible to me...
I didn't mean to single out Facebook...just used as example...
U know the covid deaths are really upsetting to me because since the beginning and we are at like 400,000 deaths...today...and they (the doctors) are still doing the same thing they were doing at 100,000...
everyone is looking for a simple answer (vaccine) instead of trying to figure out on their own...any logical thinking person would try to do the opposite first and see the results then go from there...
Does Big Pharma have all by the balls so tightly everyone is loosing sense...Your Doctors...you originally signed up to save lives...I don't know how anyone could ever give Big Pharma the right to dictate how or if you save a life...that's murder...
Comments